![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 Expand/Collapse |
|
Royal Parks, London
Rating:
(0 votes - average)
After several refusals for geocaching on their London Parks and then lobbying by a London cacher, I was invited for a meeting with their Deputy CEO, Head of Policy and a Sergeant from the Met Police.
They listened to the background and descriptions of geocaching and also to details of other landowner agreements eg NT and Met Police. Unfortunately they felt that the proximity of the Parks to high security targets such as Government, Embassies and individuals would mean that geocaching in the parks would result in reports of suspicious behaviour and more "Stop and Searches". They have therefore refused permission for caching in their parks.
__________________
Dave |
|
|
Views: 4746
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to The Wombles For This Useful Post: | ||
Mongoose39uk (15th November 2009) | ||
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Shame.
Thanks for the work.
__________________
I have a Geocaching problem...Cache Walker -Caching by byway, not highway! CacheWalker.co.uk Walking and Caching in Warwickshire, Worcestershire, Gloucestershire and surrounding areas... and CacheWalker forum “I come here for the intelligent conversation. I stay for the smut." ![]() |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Ah well, it doesn't really affect me, but it's a shame to see any blanket bans come in to force, especially after all the effort that is put in to trying to get an agreement. Cheers for trying Dave.
__________________
Cheers, Stuey ![]() ___________________________________________ ![]()
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Maybe a letter to the Queen would move things along.... or several, having obtained permission from the two parks themselves where I have caches, I passed all their risk assessments. I for will be writing... Maxkim
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
It was a very good try, but the police do have a fair point. There is too much stop and search of innocent tourists in the Capital. Recently saw a 'stereotypical' Railway enthusiast being questionned by 4 policemen at Kings Cross!
On the other hand, if caching in the central parks is a bad idea, then maybe lets consider some of the dodgy activities that occur in the outlying parks such as Bushy. I hardly ever see police around there!
__________________
He who hesitates is not only lost, but miles from the next exit. How Many Roads Must A Man Walk Down Before He Admits Hes lost? Only those who will risk going too far can possibly find out how far one can go. - TS ELLIOT |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Question everything. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Be careful with that camera as well!
http://photographernotaterrorist.org/ Quote:
![]()
__________________
I have a Geocaching problem...Cache Walker -Caching by byway, not highway! CacheWalker.co.uk Walking and Caching in Warwickshire, Worcestershire, Gloucestershire and surrounding areas... and CacheWalker forum “I come here for the intelligent conversation. I stay for the smut." ![]() |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have submitted a Petition to the Prime Minister for approval, as soon as it is listed I will post the link on here for those who wish to sign.
__________________
![]() |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Following the ban I contacted the CEO of the ROyal PArks via EMail and have today recieved this reply:
<quote> Dear Mr Mullans Thank you for your email to Mark Camley. I can understand your disappointment that we do not allow geocaching in the Royal Parks. This is a longstanding policy and is not, as you imply, a new restriction. There are security and environmental reasons why we maintain this. This agency does not hold details of the number of stop and searches that have taken place relating to this activity, as enforcement issues are a matter for the police. However the police fully support the policy and agree that to allow geocaching in the estate could present security risks and resource pressures. You mention Richmond and Bushy Parks. Richmond Park is designated as a Site of Special Scientific Interest, National Nature Reserve and as a European Special Area of Conservation. Burying a cache in the Park is actually an offence both under the Royal Parks Regulations and the Wildlife and Countryside Act. Earlier this year park staff discovered a large geocache which had been left at the base of a veteran oak tree. Whilst the person who put it there probably thought they were doing no harm, disturbance to this sensitive habitat is not acceptable. We are seeking similar protective SSSI designation for Bushy Park. Thank you for taking the time and trouble to write and I am sorry that I am unable to give you a more positive reply. <end of quote> So all in all it is not looking good for Bushy Park in the future.
__________________
![]() |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Good try, but I won't be holding my breath for a reversal of the decision. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
We can possibly use a contact I have with Hampshire Wildlife Trust. If they're happy with us placing caches on SSSI's then we might be able to convince them in the long term.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
For those that don't visit the "other place", I posted some questions about the Royal Parks CEO reply. I'm sure that some think it pointless and tiresome to keep on dragging this out...
But I don't think we should just let them go away satisfied that their ban has done the trick, without at least making them aware that we spotted that they hadn't done their homework before replying (indicating how little they thought we were worth spending time on!). And I think that the GAGB is in the best position to reply and clear up these inaccuracies, rather than just hoping that the CEO will eventually be replaced with someone who can be bothered to check. If it's just left, the Royal Parks will never give permission as they'll have a file stating that geocachers bury large boxes in the Parks, that permission has never been granted, that SSSIs can't have geocaches, that there are policing and security issues (etc). At the very least, we'll know a bit more about how to deal with it when permission gets refused. Quote:
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
As there were already caches located in other Royal Park Properties with the permission of the Local Managers. We decided to wait until negotiations between the GAGB and the Royal Park Senior Management were completed, before actioning these caches. Last week a face to face meeting between the GAGB Negotiator and Senior Royal Parks Management took place. Also present was a member of the Met Police Royal Parks Department. At this meeting it was made very clear that Geocaching was not permitted in any of the Royal Parks Properties. And as the meeting was the culmination of the negotiations. The final decision had been received off the Senior Royal Parks Management, meaning that the permissions given by the local managers had been rescinded by their senior managers. All caches active in their properties, were now there without permission, and as such we had no option but to start the Archival Process. Given that the person negotiating on behalf of the GAGB, is responsible for quite a few of the major landowner agreements. I believe he would have provided the Royal Parks Senior Management, with information that containers are not buried and that caches have been placed in SSSI's with the consent of the Designating Authorities. The Royal Parks management is an executive agency of the Department for Culture, Media and Sport. Who have several Government Ministers . Deci
__________________
If my post does not end in Deci, it is my personal opinion and as such you do not have my permission to quote me outside of these forums! Deceangi Reviewer account Mancunian Pyrocacher GC Finder account Mancunian GAGB Member account For Local Guidelines used by Groundspeak Volunteer Reviewers, please see https://wiki.groundspeak.com/display...nited+Kingdom. |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Mancunian For This Useful Post: | ||
Happy Humphrey (26th November 2009) | ||
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Aha! So you confirm that the RP CEO speaks with forked tongue...
Quote:
With all the senior and local managers involved, no wonder the default answer has to be "no". You'll never be able to get anything through that lot from the sounds of it. I hope the people who fund the Royal Parks are happy with these layers of bureaucracy. Imagine if you wanted an orienteering event - no chance! |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Deci
__________________
If my post does not end in Deci, it is my personal opinion and as such you do not have my permission to quote me outside of these forums! Deceangi Reviewer account Mancunian Pyrocacher GC Finder account Mancunian GAGB Member account For Local Guidelines used by Groundspeak Volunteer Reviewers, please see https://wiki.groundspeak.com/display...nited+Kingdom. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
| © Copyright 2004-2008 Geocaching Association of Great Britain. All rights reserved |